Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Deluxe Investment Group – Investing and Stock NewsDeluxe Investment Group – Investing and Stock News

Latest News

Support for LGBTQ+ protections is tied to politics more than population

About 1 in 10 Americans identify as LGBTQ+, according to new data from PRRI — a bit more than Gallup measured in similar polling last year.

PRRI’s data, though, offer an insight that Gallup didn’t: the size of the LGBTQ+ population in each state. Only about 4 percent of South Carolina residents indicated that they were LGBTQ+, the lowest percentage of any state. The highest percentage was in New Mexico, where an estimated 16 percent of residents fall into that category.

Those well-versed in politics might not be surprised by this. South Carolina is a conservative state and New Mexico a liberal one, so that tracks. But one state tied for the third-highest percentage of LGBTQ+ residents was very red Nebraska; very blue Hawaii was tied at the bottom for 46th place.

In fact, PRRI didn’t find much of a correlation between a state’s LGBTQ+ population and its politics. Members of that community were much more likely to say they were Democrats than Republicans (again, as you might expect), but because only 1 in 10 Americans are LGBTQ+, that doesn’t drive the overall political identity of the state.

PRRI also asked respondents whether they support legal protections for LGBTQ+ Americans. The idea had wide support, with about three-quarters of Americans expressing support for the idea. Interestingly, the level of support in a state wasn’t correlated with the size of the LGBTQ+ population.

You can see that below. We might expect that, as the LGBTQ+ population in a state increases, so does support for legal protections. Instead, we see a big cloud of states, some with large LGBTQ+ populations that are lukewarm on protections and some with relatively small populations that heavily support the idea.

But notice what happens if we color each state by its 2020 presidential vote. Now you see that most of the states toward the top — more supportive of protections — are blue, meaning they voted for President Biden. Most at the bottom are red.

In fact, if we compare the level of support for legal protections to the 2020 vote margin, we see an actual correlation. States that voted more heavily for Biden — and Utah — are more supportive of protections.

In the abstract, this makes sense. Democrats are much more supportive of those protections than Republicans, PRRI found, and states with more Democrats voted more heavily for Biden. Again, the scale of the LGBTQ+ population in any given state is modest enough that it constitutes only a fraction of the electorate.

It is nonetheless striking that the best predictor of support for protecting LGBTQ+ Americans against discrimination isn’t the percentage of LGBTQ+ people in the state. It’s the percentage of Democrats.

This post appeared first on The Washington Post

Become a VIP member by signing up for our newsletter. Enjoy exclusive content, early access to sales, and special offers just for you! As a VIP, you'll receive personalized updates, loyalty rewards, and invitations to private events. Elevate your experience and join our exclusive community today!



    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    You May Also Like

    Latest News

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) needs a massive infusion of cash in the next two months of the Republican presidential primary race to help...

    Editor's Pick

    ERP or Enterprise Resource Planning solutions help businesses of all sizes manage their daily business operations. First used in the 1990s, ERP systems have...

    Economy

    Amp’s 223.67% Leap: Analyzing the Sudden Spike The cryptocurrency community has recently been set abuzz by the phenomenal rise of Amp (AMP). Just in...

    Latest News

    The United States could be on track for a Joe Biden-Donald Trump rematch in 2024, but it’s the president’s son Hunter Biden who earned...

    Disclaimer: Deluxeinvestmentgroup.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2024 deluxeinvestmentgroup.com